The first step of our project consisted of reviewing scientific literature on research integrity to better understand what is known and what is missing in the field. We found that although most empirical papers looking at solutions to prevent misconduct target the awareness and compliance of researchers (e.g., through integrity courses and guidelines), most empirical papers looking at causes for misconduct blame issues in the system, such as competition and pressures, rather than a lack of awareness from researchers. We also found that research on research integrity generally targets the views of researchers and research students, but rarely asks other important actors for their perspective (see published results here). These two findings guided our empirical project so that we would target an issue embedded in the research system (i.e., attribution of success) through the voices of an array of different actors.